Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981474›Full record

ReviewThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2025

Computational pathology in the age of artificial intelligence - embrace not fear.

Alfonso Tan-Garcia, Tzy Harn Chua, Wei-Qiang Leow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alfonso Tan-GarciaDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-730X
Tzy Harn ChuaDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6250-2004
Wei-Qiang LeowDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6003-9837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomical pathology has traditionally relied on the interpretation of histomorphological features under a light microscope by trained pathologists for diagnosis. Technological advancements have enabled the digitisation of tissue slides to produce high-resolution whole slide images, heralding the era of digital pathology (DP). Many laboratories around the world have incorporated DP into their routine workflows owing to the myriad applications it offers in facilitating tumour board discussions, remote reporting, teaching, and research. Most significantly, DP has engendered the field of computational pathology, a novel branch of histopathology incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) models. Computational pathology has been utilised in histomorphological quantification and diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic applications due to its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, personalise treatment, and streamline workflows. Here, we highlight the work of Meier et al, Shen et al, and Lee et al, published in this journal in recent years, as they apply AI models to predict survival and treatment responses in gastric cancer, breast cancer, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, respectively. Collectively, these studies illustrate various approaches to incorporating AI into the DP pipeline and their potential clinical applications. Issues related to diagnostic accuracy, cost, patient confidentiality, and regulatory ethics still need to be addressed within the field. Despite this, the overall sentiment among pathologists is one of cautious optimism.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPathologyPathology, ClinicalBreast NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisartificial intelligencecomputational pathologydiagnostichistopathologymachine learningresearch

Identifiers

PMID40981474
PMCPMC12451823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.