ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025
Beyond emergency remote teaching: student engagement rebounds in planned online STEM laboratory courses in fall 2020.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Am I Teaching into the Void?" Instructor Perceptions of Active Learning in Online Biology Courses.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Students' engagement in STEM coursework during the COVID-19 pandemic underwent significant changes as institutions adapted to online learning. While previous research documented the immediate impacts during the emergency transition to remote learning in Spring 2020, this study examines how student engagement evolved during Fall 2020-the first full semester where both faculty and students could prepare for online instruction. Using Fredericks et al.'s framework of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement (12), we surveyed 240 undergraduate students in an introductory biology laboratory course at a public R2 university. Analysis of pre- and post-semester responses revealed significant improvements in cognitive engagement (self-efficacy; sense of belonging) and emotional engagement, while behavioral engagement remained stable. Notably, students in quarter-length courses showed greater improvements in perceived course value compared to those in semester-length courses. No significant differences were found across gender or PEER (Persons Excluded from STEM due to Ethnicity or Race) status, suggesting equitable course design. These findings contrast with Spring 2020's emergency remote teaching, where emotional engagement declined significantly. Our results indicate that intentionally designed online courses can effectively support student engagement, though challenges remain in fostering active participation in virtual environments. This study provides insights for developing resilient educational approaches that can maintain student engagement during future disruptions to traditional instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.