ArticleMethods and protocols2025
Comprehensive Protocols for Detecting Xenotransplantation-Relevant Viruses.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Xenotransplantation Literature Update: July-December 2025.XenotransplantationReview
- Is There an Ethical Dilemma in Xenotransplantation?XenotransplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues, or organs is advancing toward clinical application to address the shortage of human donor organs for treating organ failure. However, this emerging technology carries the risk of transmitting pathogenic porcine microorganisms, particularly viruses. The recent transmission of a porcine herpesvirus to the first human recipient of a pig heart highlights the urgent need for more rigorous screening of donor pigs. To identify potentially pathogenic porcine viruses, highly sensitive and specific detection methods are required. PCR-based techniques able to detect porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV), hepatitis E virus (HEV), porcine circoviruses (PCV1-4), porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses (PLHV-1-3), porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs), porcine parvovirus (PPV), Torque teno sus viruses (TTSuV1,2), atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV) and SARS-CoV-2 were established. Immunological assays that detect antibodies as indirect indicators of infection were established for PCMV/PRV, HEV, PLHVs and PERVs. Since most veterinary laboratories focus on detecting viruses that are pathogenic to pigs and cause economic losses to the swine industry, screening for viruses relevant to xenotransplantation should be conducted in specialized virological diagnostic units. In this context, we present a complete collection of the newest and detailed protocols for comprehensive viral screening, along with guidance on how to implement these methods effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.