ArticleMethods and protocols2025
A Safe and Accessible Cell-Based Spike-ACE2 Binding Assay for Evaluating SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Activity in Biological Samples Using Flow Cytometry.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Llama mRNA-LNP immunization enables rapid isolation of target specific nanobodies using cell-based panning.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, the agent responsible for coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19), has caused extensive global health and socioeconomic impact due to its transmissibility and pathology. As a result, it was classified as a Risk Group 3 human pathogen, and handling samples containing live virus requires enhanced biological containment facilities (i.e., CL3) to reduce the potential of laboratory infection to personnel and the spread of the virus into the community. While the use of an authentic live virus remains the gold standard for biological assays, alternative methods have been developed to effectively evaluate neutralization activity in the absence of a replicating viral agent. Here, we describe a cell-based spike-ACE2 binding assay as a surrogate for neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike to identify potential neutralizing antibodies. A main advantage of this approach is the exclusion of infectious viral particles, increasing biosafety for laboratory personnel. The interaction of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein with ACE2 is monitored and quantified by flow cytometry. Notably, our previous studies have demonstrated the utility of this assay for other viruses, beyond SARS-CoV-2. The methodology presented here has exhibited a strong correlation to other widely accepted methods, such as pseudotyped lentiviral and live virus neutralization assays, in identifying neutralizing antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.