ArticleMethods and protocols2025
Clinical Wound Healing After Lower Third Molar Surgery with Envelope and Bayonet Flaps: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe present study mainly aimed to identify whether the envelope and triangular flaps affected wound healing and patient quality of life differently. Secondarily, the study aimed to investigate whether some anatomical and operational variables may also affect healing. STUDY
designA prospective randomized study was conducted with 56 fully impacted lower third molars, randomly divided into two groups, one treated with the envelope flap and the other with the bayonet flap. Qualitative variables were transformed into quantitative ones and then analyzed using independent samples
resultsNo statistically significant associations were found between flap types and dehiscence, although the mean dehiscence diameter was consistently greater in the envelope flap group. The maximum diameter of the dehiscence at 14 days was found to be significantly and negatively related to the 14-day wound healing indices. Analyses relating to the quality of life did not show significant associations.
conclusionsDespite some significant healing differences between the two considered flaps exist, they do not have relevant effects on the patient's post-operative quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.