ReviewEuropean burn journal2025
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fish Skin Grafts as Wound Dressings: A Systematic Review.
Review in European burn journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful Limb Salvage Using Staged Applications of a Fish-Skin Xenograft (Kerecis) in a Heel Pad Degloving Injury: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Proximal Humerus Ewing Sarcoma: Technical Challenges and Strategies for Bone Defect Reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of fish skin grafts as xenografts is a promising alternative for wound healing. Several studies have shown fish skin grafts to be a safer and more effective option compared to other alternatives, due to the large amount of fatty acids, including omega-3, which have been proven to promote wound healing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fish skin grafts as wound dressing. A literature search up to March 2024 was conducted using the electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect. A total of 158 patients from six studies were included in this systematic review. All studies showed early wound healing using fish skin grafts; one study showed that wound healing was halved compared to paraffin gauze. Complete wound healing using fish skin grafts was noted as early as 30 days. Out of 114 patients treated with fish skin grafts, 1 patient showed signs of infection, and no patients showed allergic reactions. One study also found that fish skin grafts provide satisfactory wound scar quality. This study concludes that fish skin grafts are a great alternative and should be considered in wound treatment. The high omega-3 component that is preserved in fish skin grafts promotes faster wound healing and contains antibacterial agents that prevent infection. However, randomized control trials with a larger sample size are recommended to further assess the efficacy of fish skin grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.