ArticleAdvances in respiratory medicine2025
Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the 6-Minute Step Test and 1-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test in Post-COVID-19 Patients.
Article in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of inspiratory muscle training on exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation and strength, physical activity, and dyspnea in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and pulmonary involvement: a randomized controlled triple-blinded study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Trial
- One-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test Versus Six-Minute-Walk Test in Post-COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses during six-minute walk and step tests in mild acute COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to determine test-retest reliability and to calculate minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for the functional capacity of the 6-minute step test (6MST) and 1 min sit-to-stand test (1-min-STST), and compare these outcomes with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in post-COVID-19 patients.
methodsA total of 42 post-COVID-19 patients aged 18 years or older were recruited for this study. The post-COVID-19 patients were investigated for cardiovascular response parameters induced by a 6MWT, 6MST, and 1-min-STST on two different days, with a five-day interval between the first and second days.
resultsThe test-retest reliability obtained between the initial measurement and the measurement recorded five days later in the post-COVID-19 patients was excellent for all three of the 6MWT, 6MST, and 1-min-STST. The ICC of the 6MWT was 0.97 with MDC95 at 5.57%. The ICC of the 6MST was 0.93 with MDC95 at 12.21%, while, the ICC of the 1-min-STST was 0.96 with MDC95 at 3.61%.
conclusionsThe 6MST and 1-min-STST were valid and acceptable for the evaluation of functional capacity in post- COVID-19 patients and can be used to investigate whether each post-COVID-19 patient had made significant improvement in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.