ArticleMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Muscular Performance Is Not Significantly Altered Throughout Phases of the Menstrual Cycle or a Hormonal Contraceptive Cycle in Collegiate Softball Players.
Article in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potential variability in neuromuscular function or physiology throughout the menstrual cycle (MC) or a cycle of using hormonal contraceptives may affect muscular performance variables that are relevant to exercise, training, or sport. Collegiate softball players (n = 11) that reported using and not using hormonal contraceptives completed three testing sessions during their respective early follicular, ovulatory, and mid luteal phases of the MC or early, mid, or late phases of their hormonal contraceptive cycle (HCC). Each testing session included a series of performance tests: countermovement jump on a force plate, 15-yard sprints, velocity assessment of the back squat performed at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM), one-repetition maximum bench press, and 70% 1-RM repetitions to failure testing on the bench press. No significant differences were found for any of the performance tests between the three phases, though performance on most tasks peaked during the mid luteal/late phases of the MC/HCC. It is important to note that this study was underpowered and this could have masked any observed differences. Collectively, muscular performance was not significantly different throughout phases of the MC or HCC in these athletes, indicating that potential hormonal variability throughout the MC or HCC did not seem to have an effect on performance outcomes in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.