Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981030›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2025

Sports Performance and Injury Epidemiology in Portuguese XV Rugby Union's 2023 World Cup Preparation in a High-Altitude Center: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Carlos Braga, António Cruz-Ferreira, Luiz Miguel Santiago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos BragaUSF Norton de Matos, ULS Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-1180-9889
António Cruz-FerreiraFederação Portuguesa de Rugby, 1600-131 Lisboa, Portugal.
Luiz Miguel SantiagoFaculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRugby Union's physical demands lead to high injury rates, requiring players to optimize their abilities. Altitude training enhances performance but poses risks to injuries.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study compares the Portuguese Rugby team's injury rates and Global Positioning System (GPS) performance data during the Rugby World Cup (RWC) 2023 preparation phase. Two medical doctors from the medical Portuguese department diagnosed and recorded all the injuries occurred. GPS players data recorded the following: running distance (RD), high-speed running distance (HSRD), number of accelerations of high intensity (HI), maximum velocity (MV), and percentage of personal maximum velocity (% MV). Data were analyzed by position and growth rate (∆) comparing sea level (Cycle 1) and altitude (Cycle 2). The players were analyzed by injury severity, type, anatomical location, and GPS performance metrics.

resultsA higher number of injuries was recorded in Cycle 2 compared to Cycle 1 (∆ = +5 for forwards; ∆ = +3.5 for backs). While average values for MV and % MV showed a downward trend, RD, HSRD, and HI exhibited upward trends. However, none of these differences reached statistical significance.

conclusionsInjury counts and training volume indicators showed upward trends, while MV and % MV declined, though none reached statistical significance. These patterns should be interpreted cautiously, and further research is needed to explore GPS metrics in injury monitoring.

Indexed as

GPS datainjuriesperformanceRugby Unionsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID40981030
PMCPMC12452366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.