Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980944›Full record

SynthesisGlobal change biology2025

Differing Impacts of Livestock Farming and Ranching on Aquatic Insect Biodiversity: A Global Meta-Analysis.

Lindsey A Barnes, Emily Wenban-Smith, Grace Skinner, Lynn V Dicks, Joseph Millard, Andrew J Bladon

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsey A BarnesDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-7485
Emily Wenban-SmithDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Grace SkinnerUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6972-2963
Lynn V DicksDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-4468
Joseph MillardDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-3565
Andrew J BladonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-1247

Funding

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology NE/V006800/1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology NE/V007173/1Isaac Newton TrustLeverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship ECF-2024-017Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge Research Studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies examining global insect biodiversity trends have shown declines for many terrestrial species but increases in some aquatic species, albeit with limited spatial coverage. However, the impact of a wide range of threats on insect biodiversity remains uncertain at a global scale. Livestock farming and ranching constitute approximately 30% of global land use and represent a major and growing threat to biodiversity. Although we know livestock farming and ranching affect aquatic macroinvertebrates via degradation of water quality and habitat, there are no global syntheses of the impacts of livestock on the biodiversity of aquatic insects. Here, we investigate the impact of livestock farming and ranching on the abundance and richness of five major aquatic insect orders: Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), Trichoptera (caddisflies), Megaloptera (dobsonflies and alderflies), and Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies). Our meta-analysis shows that livestock farming significantly reduces species richness of Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, and Plecoptera compared to areas with no livestock present. In contrast, we found no overall impact of livestock farming on the abundance of aquatic insects or individual orders, even after accounting for moderators such as livestock type, riparian vegetation presence, and stocking density. The apparent stability in insect abundance, combined with declines in richness, suggests there may be shifts in community composition that cannot be captured with a broad-scale analysis. Further research is needed at finer taxonomic resolution, coupled with increased reporting of quantitative stocking density and livestock water access, to better understand the apparently heterogeneous effects of livestock on aquatic insects and predict the impacts of further spread and intensification of livestock farming.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimal HusbandryBiodiversityInsectaLivestockAnimalsEphemeropteraEPTlivestock grazingmacroinvertebratesMegalopteraOdonataPlecopteraTrichoptera

Identifiers

PMID40980944
PMCPMC12452056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.