ArticlemSphere2025
Rapid, accurate, and reproducible
Article in mSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic insights into low-level rifampicin resistance mediated by borderlineMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As one of the deadliest infectious diseases in the world, tuberculosis is responsible for millions of new cases and deaths reported annually. The rise of drug-resistant tuberculosis, particularly resistance to first-line treatments like rifampicin, presents a critical challenge for global health, which complicates the treatment strategies and calls for effective diagnostic and predictive tools. In this study, we apply an ensemble-based molecular dynamics computer simulation method, TIES_PM, to estimate the binding affinity through free energy calculations and predict rifampicin resistance in RNA polymerase. By analyzing 61 mutations, including those in the rifampicin resistance-determining region, TIES_PM produces reliable results in good agreement with clinical reference and identifies abnormal data points indicating alternative mechanisms of resistance. In the future, TIES_PM is capable of identifying and selecting leads with a lower risk of resistance evolution and, for smaller proteins, it may systematically predict antibiotic resistance by analyzing all possible codon permutations. Moreover, its flexibility allows for extending predictions to other first-line drugs and drug-resistant diseases. TIES_PM provides a rapid, accurate, low-cost, and scalable supplement to current diagnostic pipelines, particularly for drug resistance screening in both research and clinical domains.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial resistance (AMR), a global threat, challenges early diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (TB). This study employs TIES_PM, a free-energy calculation method, to efficiently predict AMR by quantifying how mutations in bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) affect rifampicin (RIF) binding. On simulating 61 clinically observed mutations, the results align with WHO classifications and reveal ambiguous cases, suggesting alternative resistance mechanisms. Each mutation requires ~5 h, offering rapid, cost-effective predictions. An ensemble approach ensures statistical robustness. TIES_PM can be extended to smaller proteins for systematic codon permutation analysis, enabling comprehensive antibiotic resistance prediction, or adapted to identify low-resistance-risk drug leads. It also applies to other TB drugs and resistant pathogens, supporting personalized therapy and global AMR surveillance. This work provides novel tools to refine resistance mutation databases and phenotypic classification standards, enhancing early diagnosis while advancing translational research and infectious disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.