ArticlemSystems2025
Metabolic capabilities of key rumen microbiota drive methane emissions in cattle.
Article in mSystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apple pomace and hempseed cake can reduce methane intensity (CH₄/DMI) and alter the rumen microbiome in dairy cows: a shotgun metagenomic approach.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
- Intricate microbiome differences observed in lactating cows across methane intensity phenotypes.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Cobalt and Vitamin B12 in Dairy Cattle Nutrition: Requirements, Functions, and Interactions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rumen microbiome plays a critical role in determining feed conversion and methane emissions in cattle, with significant implications for both agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. In this study, we applied a hierarchical joint species distribution model to predict directional associations between biotic factors and abundances of microbial populations determined via metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Our analysis revealed distinct microbial differences, including 191 MAGs significantly more abundant in animals with a higher methane yield (above 24 g/kg dry matter intake [DMI]; high-emission cattle), and 220 MAGs more abundant in low-emission cattle. Interestingly, the microbiome community of the low-methane-emission rumen exhibited higher metabolic capacity but with lower functional redundancy compared to that of high-methane-emission cattle. Our findings also suggest that microbiomes associated with low methane yields are prevalent in specific functionalities such as active fiber hydrolysis and succinate production, which may enhance their contributions to feed conversion in the host animal. This study provides an alternate genome-centric means to investigate the microbial ecology of the rumen and identify microbial and metabolic intervention targets that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production systems. IMPORTANCE: Ruminant livestock are major contributors to global methane emissions, largely through microbial fermentation in the rumen. Understanding how microbial communities vary between high- and low-methane-emitting animals is critical for identifying mitigation strategies. This study leverages a genome-centric approach to link microbial metabolic traits to methane output in cattle. By reconstructing and functionally characterizing hundreds of microbial genomes, we observe that a low-methane-emission rumen harbors well-balanced, "streamlined" microbial communities characterized by high metabolic capacity and minimal metabolic overlap across populations (low functional redundancy). Our results demonstrate the utility of genome-level functional profiling in uncovering microbial community traits tied to climate-relevant phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.