ReviewCureus2025
Perioperative Telemedicine Care in Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practices in prehabilitation and follow-up after hernia surgery: a global survey of 135 surgeons from 20 countries.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has been increasingly incorporated into medical practice in the last few years. However, it is still not a routine practice in our field. There is limited data on the impact of telemedicine on outcomes in hernia surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes between telemedical perioperative care and in-person traditional care in hernia surgery. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing Telemedical interventions and traditional In-Person perioperative care for hernia surgery. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). One thousand and thirty-four articles were screened, and 39 were thoroughly reviewed. We included three observational retrospective studies, with 2,582 patients receiving telemedicine or in-person care for hernia surgery repair. A total of 2,049 (79%) patients received telemedicine care, and 533 (21%) received traditional care. There was no significant differences in overall complications (14% vs. 13%; odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.48;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.