ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025
TACE-HAIC versus TACE as Initial Regional Therapy for Unresectable Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma (>10 cm): A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- DEB-TACE-HAIC combined with donafenib and camrelizumab in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Combination of locoregional and systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenges in treatment, particularly when tumors are unresectable and huge. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for this patient population. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with unresectable huge HCC (>10 cm) who received either TACE-HAIC or TACE as initial regional treatment from January 2020 to December 2023. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated by propensity score matching (PSM). Results: Among the 242 patients included, 132 received TACE-HAIC and 110 received TACE. After PSM, 77 matched pairs were analyzed. The TACE-HAIC group had significantly higher objective response (74.0% vs 58.4%, Conclusion: Compared to TACE alone, TACE-HAIC therapy presented an acceptable safety profile, and offered improved local efficacy and prolonged survival benefits in patients with unresectable huge HCC (> 10 cm).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.