ArticleEvolution letters2025
Replicate geographic transects across a hybrid zone reveal parallelism and differences in the genetic architecture of reproductive isolation.
Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybridization but Minimal Introgression: Ecologically-Based Divergent Selection Maintains a Steep Hybrid Zone in Parapatric Stickleback Fish.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Replicated hybrid zones reveal genomic patterns of local adaptation and introgression in spruce.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic signatures of reproductive isolation are decoupled from floral divergence in a long-standing hybrid zone.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation revisited.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining the genetic architecture of traits involved in adaptation and speciation is one of the key components of understanding the evolutionary mechanisms behind biological diversification. Hybrid zones provide a unique opportunity to use genetic admixture to identify traits and loci contributing to partial reproductive barriers between taxa. Many studies have focused on the temporal dynamics of hybrid zones, but geographical variation in hybrid zones that span distinct ecological contexts has received less attention. We address this knowledge gap by analyzing hybridization and introgression between black-capped and Carolina chickadees in two geographically remote transects across their extensive hybrid zone, one located in eastern and one in central North America. Previous studies demonstrated that this hybrid zone is moving northward as a result of climate change but is staying consistently narrow due to selection against hybrids. In addition, the hybrid zone is moving ~5× slower in central North America compared to more eastern regions, reflecting continent-wide variation in the rate of climate change. We use whole genome sequencing of 259 individuals to assess whether variation in the rate of hybrid zone movement is reflected in patterns of hybridization and introgression, and which genes and genomic regions show consistently restricted introgression in distinct ecological contexts. Our results highlight substantial similarities between geographically remote transects and reveal large Z-linked chromosomal rearrangements that generate measurable differences in the degree of gene flow between transects. We further use simulations and analyses of climatic data to examine potential factors contributing to continental-scale nuances in selection pressures. We discuss our findings in the context of speciation mechanisms and the importance of sex chromosome inversions in chickadees and other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.