Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980695›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Design and Development of a Simple Screw Mechanism for a Low-Cost Neonatal Syringe Pump.

Oliver Norton, Prashant Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oliver NortonDepartment of Biomedical and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0402-3336
Prashant JhaDepartment of Biomedical and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 2.3 million neonates die annually. UNICEF proposes that the deployment of specialist, quality neonatal care could help reduce neonatal mortality rates by 28% by 2025. Syringe pumps are a key medical device for providing accurate and precise fluid and drug delivery to neonates. However, syringe pumps are expensive, complicated to use and not designed for the additional challenges of providing quality healthcare in low resource healthcare settings. Several open-source designs for low-cost syringe pumps already exist, however, they all have respective limitations. Objective: To design and test a simple, open-source, screw mechanism, with the potential to be used in a future low-cost syringe pump. Methods and Materials: A low-cost screw mechanism for a syringe pump, using a non-captive stepper motor, was developed. The prototype's accuracy was tested using 5mL, 20mL, 30mL and 60mL syringes at different rates. The rate was measured by recording the changing mass of saline fluid dispensed onto a weighing scale. The mean flow rate error from each run was calculated as the time taken to infuse 75% of the nominal volume, as per the ISO 286020:2020 standard. Results: The prototype produced a total mean flow rate error of 0.38%±1.62%. All errors were within the 3% limit (Z-score: 0.125) stipulated by the UNICEF and NEST360 target product profile. Compared to the other open-source designs, the prototype has the fewest parts, can accommodate a range of syringe sizes and is more accurate than many of the other open-source designs. Future work should involve testing the device with more viscous fluids, a greater range of rates and microstep settings, and improving the accuracy with further software and hardware development.

Indexed as

low-costneonatalopen-sourcesyringe pump

Identifiers

PMID40980695
PMCPMC12449876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.