ReviewPrecision clinical medicine2025
Molecular mechanisms and genetic features of cholangiocarcinoma: implications for targeted therapeutic strategies.
Review in Precision clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histone modifications: mechanisms, metabolic regulation, and therapeutic targeting in cancer.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting the Notch signaling pathway in digestive system cancers: from bench to bedside.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Protein modification systems as cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ligustilide: A Phytochemical with Potential in Combating Cancer Development and Progression-A Comprehensive and Critical Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metabolic collusion driving immune evasion in cholangiocarcinoma: unmasking the dual control of the immuno-metabolic microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biologically diverse and highly aggressive cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium. It is typically divided into intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal types, each with distinct clinical behavior, genetic alterations, and therapeutic responses. Worldwide, the global incidence of CCA has risen steadily, accounting for nearly 15% of liver cancers and ∼3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. CCA often presents at an advanced stage due to its silent onset and shows poor responsiveness to conventional chemotherapy, resulting in high mortality, accounting for ∼2% of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Risk factors include parasitic infections like liver flukes and chronic biliary diseases such as cholelithiasis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, although most cases have unknown origins. While early-stage patients may benefit from surgical resection or liver transplantation, these options are often not viable in advanced disease due to high relapse rates. In cases of unresectable or metastatic CCA, treatment remains difficult due to resistance and a lack of effective targeted therapies. This review systematically integrates the genomic, epigenetic, and signaling network mechanisms underlying CCA with their translational implications, providing a critical synthesis of the rapidly evolving field of targeted therapies, including recently approved Food and Drug Administration treatments and emerging novel agents. We specifically emphasize the key mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and corresponding strategies to overcome them, present an updated evaluation of vulnerabilities across distinct molecular subgroups, and explore the major challenges and future trajectories for advancing biomarker-driven precision medicine in CCA, thereby offering a forward-looking and clinically relevant perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.