ArticleKidney international reports2025
Hemodiafiltration Attenuates NETosis Compared With High-Flux Hemodialysis in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes mellitus face a heightened risk of cardiovascular complications and infections, potentially exacerbated by dysregulated NETosis. Given the superior survival rates observed with hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD; HFHD) and the documented NETosis dysregulation in HD and in patients with diabetes mellitus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of dialysis modality on NETosis activity in patients on HD, stratified by diabetes status. Methods: A total of 20 patients on HD (10 with diabetes, 10 without diabetes) undergoing HDF treatment were recruited. Blood samples were collected before and after HDF. After transition to HFHD treatment, blood samples were taken again after 1 and 3 weeks of HDFD treatment. Neutrophils were isolated, stimulated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, and stained for the following NETosis markers: peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), neutrophil elastase (NE), myeloperoxidase (MPO), histone H3, and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Data were acquired using a flow cytometer. In addition, serum levels of citrullinated histone H3 (citH3), MPO, and NE were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Our results demonstrate a significant increase in NETosis activation and markers after HFHD treatment compared with HDF treatment. NETosis markers significantly increased in serum after 3 weeks of HFHD treatment. In addition, significantly lower NETosis markers were observed in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes. Conclusion: The increase in NETosis markers after 3 weeks of HFHD compared with HDF highlights the role of HDF in mitigating dysregulated NETosis. Further research is needed to explore differences in NETosis profiles across patient populations and assess their clinical implications based on dialysis modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.