Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980647›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

Patient Satisfaction Following a Session With a Kidney Genetic Counselor.

Meg M Hager, Quinn Stein, Emily Hendricks, Maggie Westemeyer, Edye Conway, Cassie Vance, Darbey Raible, Kelsey McQueen, Tessa Pitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meg M HagerNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Quinn SteinNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Emily HendricksNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Maggie WestemeyerNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Edye ConwayNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Cassie VanceNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Darbey RaibleNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.
Kelsey McQueenNational PKU Alliance, Washington, DC, USA.
Tessa PitmanNatera, Inc. Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic counseling's impact on patients with kidney disease is understudied, despite 20% of adults with kidney disease having a monogenic cause. We sought to understand whether laboratory genetic counselors (GCs) provided a positive patient experience and increased access to genetic expertise. Methods: A 47-question survey was developed and sent to patients following a genetic information session provided by laboratory GCs employed by a genetic testing company, to review genetic results from the Renasight Results: Over 18 months, 316 responses were recorded. Overall, 92% of respondents (228/247) indicated that the genetic information session was valuable to them. Most respondents (60%, 145/244) felt they had actionable steps to take after the session, including: meeting with an extrarenal specialist for management related to the genetic diagnosis, family planning, seeing a local genetics provider, or sharing results with relatives. In addition, 78% of respondents (193/247) felt that they had sufficient information to make decisions about their health care following their session. Only 13% of patients (34/253) were aware of their access to a local GC if the genetic information session was unavailable. Conclusion: This study examined patient satisfaction following a discussion with a laboratory GC to review genetic test results for hereditary kidney disorders. This study demonstrates that laboratory GCs provide patients with increased access to genetic counseling, valuable information that helps patients and their families navigate their clinical journeys, and act as a complementary resource to providers ordering kidney genetic testing.

Indexed as

genetic counselingmultigene testingpatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40980647
PMCPMC12446862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.