Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980638›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

Beta-glucans from oats or barley and reduction of postprandial glycaemic responses: Modification of an authorised health claim pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 following a request in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Montaña Cámara, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan de Henauw, Karen-Ildico Hirsch-Ernst, Angeles Jos, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA)
Dominique Turck
Torsten Bohn
Montaña Cámara
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Stefaan de Henauw
Karen-Ildico Hirsch-Ernst
Angeles Jos
Alexandre Maciuk
Inge Mangelsdorf
Breige McNulty
Androniki Naska
Kristina Pentieva
Frank Thies
Ines Drenjančević
Ionut Craciun
Thibault Fiolet
Alfonso Siani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following an application from PepsiCo International, submitted pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Ireland, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the modification of an authorised health claim related to beta-glucans from oats or barley and reduction of postprandial glycaemic responses. The proposed modification concerns a reduction of the lowest effective dose from 4 g to 2 g of beta-glucans (BG) per 30 g of available carbohydrates (avCHO). Beta-glucans from oat and barley, which are the subject of the health claim, have been sufficiently characterised. A reduction of postprandial glycaemic responses is a beneficial physiological effect in the context of the food/constituent and the target population for this claim. The applicant submitted 21 pertinent published human intervention studies (59 trial comparisons) investigating the effect of beta-glucans from oat or barley on the postprandial incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for glucose using matched comparators and conducted a dose-response meta-regression analysis. Four published systematic reviews and dose-response meta-regression analyses were also provided. In weighing the evidence, the Panel considered that the human intervention studies did not consistently show a significant effect of beta-glucans from oats or barley on postprandial glucose iAUC at doses between 2 and < 4 g BG/30 g avCHO, and that dose-response data suggest a lowest effective dose above the 2 g/30 g avCHO proposed by the applicant. The Panel concludes that a consistent effect of beta-glucans from oats or barley on the reduction of postprandial glycaemic responses has not been demonstrated under the conditions of use proposed by the applicant of at least 2 g BG/30 g avCHO consumed with a meal.

Indexed as

barleybeta‐glucansglycaemic responsehealth claimoats

Identifiers

PMID40980638
PMCPMC12447000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.