ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Design and Validation of the Self-efficacy of Care Questionnaire for Adolescents with Mental Disorders.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-efficacy of care is based on health-promoting behaviors that are formed through dealing with disease conditions and the ability to treatment adherence and management of complications. This study was conducted to design and validate an assessment tool for adolescents with mental disorders. Materials and Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach to develop a questionnaire aimed at measuring self-efficacy of care among adolescents with mental disorders. Content validity was assessed using both qualitative and quantitative methods, while exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, convergent validity, and reliability were evaluated through quantitative approaches. Participants, including nurses, psychologists, and adolescent patients, were selected through convenience sampling. The data was analysed using SPSS (version 25.0, Chicago: SPSS Inc.) and LISREL (version 8.72, Jöreskog and Sörbom, 2005) software. Results: Initially, an item pool consisting of 87 items was generated based on findings from the original research. Following face and content validation, and subsequent exploratory factor analysis, 28 items across four factors were identified: "health information seeking behavior", "adaptation of life to disease conditions and treatment", "adaptive coping", and "social self-care". The factorial structure of the questionnaire was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity, assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale, was positive and statistically significant ( Conclusions: The questionnaire demonstrated strong internal consistency and confirmed construct validity. Therefore, this instrument can be reliably used in both clinical and research practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.