ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Patients, antibiotics and
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Patients with recurrent Methods: Ten interviews, conducted with rCDI patients based on open-ended questions, were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: All the respondents identified antibiotic treatment as a trigger of rCDI, but they were unaware of other important factors. They also reported receiving inadequate information, often entirely absent or delivered by healthcare professionals under great pressure, together with other barriers that prevented successful information transmission. In addition to a lack of proper information, they described self-created barriers, some of which were severely counterproductive or even harmful, such as avoiding healthcare when they were ill or not collecting prescribed antibiotics due to fear. Conclusions: The respondents were often left to seek information and develop explanatory models, strategies and behaviours for the future by themselves. We recommend more standardized and personalized patient information to support effective preventive behaviours and to foster a better understanding of one of the most important tools of modern medicine-antibiotics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.