ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Medical Mycology Education in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Schools.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the high burden of fungal infections in Brazil, little is known about how medical mycology is taught in Brazilian medical schools. Adequate education is essential to improve clinical recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of fungal diseases. Objectives: To assess the structure, content, and challenges of medical mycology education across medical schools in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among all 21 medical schools in the state. Nineteen schools (90.5%) responded to a structured questionnaire addressing curricula, infrastructure, faculty training, and perceived barriers. Results: All responding institutions include medical mycology in their curricula, though none offer it as a stand-alone subject. Teaching is typically embedded within microbiology (89.5%) and infectious diseases (57.9%). Only 21.1% dedicate over 40 h to the topic. While most schools address superficial (94.7%), systemic (94.7%), subcutaneous (89.5%), and opportunistic (94.7%) mycoses, practical diagnostic exercises are limited. Only 52.6% provide hands-on diagnostic training, and 42.1% have a dedicated mycology lab. Most instructors have doctoral degrees (73.7%), but only 10.5% specialized in mycology. Student evaluation and curricular updates are infrequent, and institutional support for mycology education remains constrained. Conclusions: Mycology teaching in southern Brazil is widespread but insufficiently structured. Although the state has a strong historical tradition in fungal disease research, significant gaps remain in faculty expertise, infrastructure, and curricular innovation. Targeted investment in laboratory training and faculty development is urgently needed to strengthen clinical education preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.