Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980553›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Exploration of chaos game representation and integrative deep learning approaches for whole-genome sequencing-based grapevine genetic testing.

Andrew Vu, Brendan Park, Yifeng Li, Ping Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew VuDepartment of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1807-3289
Brendan ParkDepartment of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5127-7168
Yifeng LiDepartment of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4873-6928
Ping LiangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-0636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The identification of grapevine species, cultivars, and clones associated with desired traits is an important component of viticulture. True-to-type identification is very challenging for grapevine due to the existence of a large number of cultivars and clones and the historical issues of synonyms and homonyms. DNA-based identification, superior to morphology-based methods, has been used as the current standard true-to-type method for grapevine, but not without shortcomings, such as the limited number of biomarkers and accessibility of services. Results: To overcome some of the limitations of traditional microsatellite-marker-based genetic testing, we explored a whole-genome-sequencing (WGS)-based approach to achieve the best accuracy at an affordable cost. To address the challenges of the extreme high dimensionality of the WGS data, we examined the effectiveness of using chaos game representation (CGR) to represent the genome sequence data and using deep learning for species and cultivar identification. CGR images provide a meaningful way to capture patterns for use with visual analysis, with the best results showing a 99% balanced accuracy in classifying five species, and a 80% balanced accuracy in predicting 41 cultivars. Our preliminary research highlights the potential for CGR and deep learning as a complementary tool for WGS-based species- and cultivar-level classification. Availability and implementation: Our implementation, including the pipeline for data processing and the four predictive models, is available at https://github.com/pliang64/CGR.

Identifiers

PMID40980553
PMCPMC12449056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.