ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
Comparative Outcomes of GH Treatment in Pediatric Idiopathic Short Stature and GH Deficiency.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Multiple clinical effects of recombinant human growth hormone therapy].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Review
- Comparative Outcomes of GH Treatment in Pediatric Idiopathic Short Stature and GH Deficiency.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: GH treatment in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) can be controversial, and analyses comparing responses to children with GH deficiency (GHD) are limited. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of GH treatment in children with ISS and GHD, including those reaching near adult height (NAH). Methods: This post hoc analysis of the NordiNet International Outcome Study (2006-2016) and the American Norditropin Studies: Web-Enabled Research Program (2002-2016) included children with ISS or GHD who initiated treatment aged <18 years. The safety analysis set had birthdate and GH exposure information. The effectiveness analysis set was GH-naïve with valid baseline information. GH exposure, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were analyzed annually for ≤10 years. Results: The safety analysis set included 3816 children with ISS and 22 858 with GHD. The effectiveness analysis set comprised 18 405 children (ISS: 2684; GHD: 15 721), 1856 of whom reached NAH (ISS: 230; GHD: 1626). Average dose of GH was higher for children with ISS vs children with GHD but mean duration of treatment was shorter. At NAH, height SD score (mean [SD]) was -1.21 (1.09) and -0.90 (1.20) for children with ISS and GHD, respectively, whereas change in height SD score (mean [SD]) from baseline to 10 years was 1.21 (0.86) and 1.45 (1.09). Incidence of adverse reactions was similar across indications, with no new safety signals. Conclusion: GH treatment over 5 to 10 years effectively increased height in children with ISS and children with GHD, including those who reached NAH, with a favorable benefit-risk profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.