ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Characteristics and Outcomes of Limb Loss Support Groups.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline PTSD and depressive symptoms predict multidimensional recovery after combat-related transtibial amputation: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically understand the structure and outcomes of limb loss support groups. Data Sources: Literature review performed during June and July 2024. Search strategy included terms related to amputation and support group. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Publication range was 2009-2024. Study Selection: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses methodology was used to identify 7 appropriate articles of 199 initial articles. Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scale. Data Extraction: Logic model constructs were used to extract support group inputs, outputs, and outcomes, and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change constructs were used to extract recommendations/strategies. Data Synthesis: All 7 studies discussed inputs including participant age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Most support groups were predominantly White and younger and had more affluent attendees than the general limb loss population. Outputs were discussed in 5 studies, with location, group leadership, and other personnel being the most commonly discussed outputs. All studies discussed positive outcomes such as physical ability and mobility improvement on the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, emotional development with improved Posttraumatic Growth Index scores and depression symptoms, and learning and prosthesis advancement with improved self-efficacy and return to life. Six articles discussed implementation strategies including facilitation of support groups, promotion of adaptability, shadowing of other experts, and tailoring of strategies. Conclusions: These data highlight structure, development strategies, and positive effects of support groups for mobility, emotional well-being, and learning in individuals with limb loss. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need for continued investigation into support mechanisms and formal incorporation of support groups into limb loss rehabilitation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.