Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980519›Full record

ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025

The Use of Physiotherapy Navigators in Acute Cancer Care Settings: A Scoping Review.

Holly Edward, Nelani Paramanantharajah, Neeraja Nannapaneni, Jenette Wu, Sarah Wojkowski, Luciana Macedo, Som D Mukherjee, Jenna Smith-Turchyn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A qualitative study of cancer survivors' exercise behaviour 4 months after a telerehabilitation program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. A qualitative analysis of cancer patients' views on facilitators and barriers for the implementation of oncological exercise therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Holly EdwardSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nelani ParamanantharajahSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neeraja NannapaneniSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jenette WuSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah WojkowskiSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Luciana MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Som D MukherjeeOncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jenna Smith-TurchynSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to explore and map the use of physiotherapist (PT) navigator roles, their settings, decision-making processes, interventions delivered, barriers, and facilitators in acute cancer care settings. Data Sources: Five databases and gray literature sources were searched to July 4, 2024. Study Selection: To be included in this review, studies must have included adults ≥18 years old living with cancer, used a navigation role or model of care led by a physiotherapist, and occurred in an acute cancer care setting (ie, a setting administering cancer treatments to individuals with a current diagnosis of cancer). Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers completed all screening and data extraction. Data Synthesis: Data were summarized narratively, and descriptive statistics were provided where applicable. Thirteen references were included; 6 perspective papers, 5 research articles, and 2 presentations. The characteristics of PT navigator roles varied but mainly included triaging through assessment (n=13; 100%), exercise planning and prescription (n=9; 69.2%), referral to appropriate services (n=7; 53.8%), barrier identification (n=5; 38.5%), providing education (n=4; 30.8%), and goal setting (n=2; 15.4%). Most PT navigators (n=10; 76.9%) interacted with patients within the first month of treatment and followed up at various timepoints (eg, weekly, monthly, as needed). A range of facilitators (eg, onsite services, support from the medical team, no patient cost to interact with the PT navigator) and barriers (eg, lack of health system funding, lack of medical team knowledge of rehabilitation, and additional patient costs) to the PT navigator role were identified. Conclusions: This review summarized and mapped the current evidence regarding PT navigation in acute cancer care settings. Future research and clinical programs to enhance the design and implementation of such roles are recommended.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient navigationPhysical therapistsRehabilitationTriage

Identifiers

PMID40980519
PMCPMC12447208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.