ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Feasibility, Usability, and Acceptability of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Teleexercise Interventions for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Interim Analysis of the Spinal Cord Injury Program in Exercise (SCIPE) Study.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multidimensional Effects of Telemedicine on Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the Spinal Cord Injury Program in Exercise intervention. Design: Three-arm randomized controlled trial. Setting: Video-based exercise sessions via an online teleexercise platform. Participants: Thirty-six participants (N=36) with spinal cord injury (52.8% women, 47.2% men), aged 18-65 years, were randomized to movement-to-music (M2M, n=12), standard exercise training (SET, n=12), or attention control (AC, n=12). Interventions: M2M and SET participants completed 3 weekly exercise sessions for 8 weeks, while AC participants received weekly educational articles. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes included feasibility (recruitment and retention rates), platform usability (System Usability Scale, Health IT Usability Evaluation, and qualitative interviews), and acceptability (8-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale and qualitative interviews). Preliminary outcomes included changes in physical activity (Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury) and quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms) at 8 weeks postintervention. Analyses included descriptive statistics, effect size estimation, and qualitative interview analysis. Results: Follow-up retention at weeks 8, 12, and 16 was 66.7%, 41.7%, and 41.7% for M2M; 83.3%, 66.7%, and 66.7% for SET; and 83.3%, 75.0%, and 66.7% for AC, respectively. The mean ± SD of system usability scale score was 69.8±17.1. SET participants rated the intervention "good," and M2M and AC rated it "fair." The mean Health IT usability evaluation scale score of 3.61±0.54 indicated moderate satisfaction, with "Impact" highest and "Perceived Usefulness" lowest. Preliminary outcomes suggested small to moderate improvements in physical activity and quality of life for SET, with effect sizes (Hedge's Conclusions: The interim analysis shows high feasibility and moderate usability and acceptability. Preliminary outcomes suggest potential benefits in physical activity and quality of life, particularly for SET. Future research should focus on enhancing platform usability and long-term participant engagement strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.