ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Transition Aged Individuals With Cerebral Palsy Have Larger Clinical Gains With Visual Performance Feedback During Power Training.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate if providing visual feedback (VFB) on the speed of the movement during a lower extremity power training treatment protocol results in greater clinical gains in transition aged individuals with cerebral palsy (CP). Design: Nonrandomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Twenty transition aged persons (N=20) with CP (age range, 11-24y; Gross Motor Function Classification Score [GMFCS], I-IV). Interventions: Twenty-four (8wks; 3d/wk) lower extremity power training sessions while receiving either VFB of their performance or no feedback (NFB) on their performance. Main Outcome Measures: Bilateral leg press 1-repetition maximum (1RM), bilateral leg peak power production and walking speed reserve. Results: The VFB group had greater lower extremity strength gains than the NFB group ( Conclusions: VFB during power training has the potential to results in larger clinical gains for transition aged individuals with CP. Individuals with higher GMFCS levels, lower muscular strength and muscular power at baseline might not demonstrate as large of gains after power training even when VFB is provided. Alternative treatment strategies should be considered for these cases. Nevertheless, our results convey that learning to perform fast lower extremity motor actions likely has clinically relevant benefits for transition aged individuals with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.