ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2024
Recurrent neural network dynamical systems for biological vision.
Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noisy models of the ventral stream reveal the impact of recurrence and learned representations on information processing timescales.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Recurrent neural network models reveal unified mechanisms generating event-related potentials from MMN to P300.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In neuroscience, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are modeled as continuous-time dynamical systems to more accurately reflect the dynamics inherent in biological circuits. However, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) remain the preferred architecture in vision neuroscience due to their ability to efficiently process visual information, which comes at the cost of the biological realism provided by RNNs. To address this, we introduce a hybrid architecture that integrates the continuous-time recurrent dynamics of RNNs with the spatial processing capabilities of CNNs. Our models preserve the dynamical characteristics typical of RNNs while having comparable performance with their conventional CNN counterparts on benchmarks like ImageNet. Compared to conventional CNNs, our models demonstrate increased robustness to noise due to noise-suppressing mechanisms inherent in recurrent dynamical systems. Analyzing our architecture as a dynamical system is computationally expensive, so we develop a toolkit consisting of iterative methods specifically tailored for convolutional structures. We also train multi-area RNNs using our architecture as the front-end to perform complex cognitive tasks previously impossible to learn or achievable only with oversimplified stimulus representations. In monkey neural recordings, our models capture time-dependent variations in neural activity in higher-order visual areas. Together, these contributions represent a comprehensive foundation to unify the advances of CNNs and dynamical RNNs in vision neuroscience.
Identifiers
40980486PMC12448710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.