Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980456›Full record

ReviewScience and technology of advanced materials2025

Engineering 3D copper foam current collectors: modification strategies and challenges toward stable lithium metal batteries.

Dong-Run Yang, Qingsong Lai, Yu-Tong Long, Xu Shi, Yue Lu, Zhao-Meng Liu, Xuan-Wen Gao, Wen-Bin Luo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Designing with LiSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dong-Run YangInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Qingsong LaiInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yu-Tong LongInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xu ShiInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yue LuInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Zhao-Meng LiuInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xuan-Wen GaoInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Wen-Bin LuoInstitute for Energy Electrochemistry and Urban Mines Metallurgy, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium metal is a promising anode for high-energy batteries due to its high capacity and low density. However, issues like dendrite growth and volume expansion limit its practical use. To address these challenges, three-dimensional (3D) copper foam current collectors with porous architectures and superior electrochemical properties have emerged as a research focus. Three-dimensional copper foam current collectors have emerged as a strategic solution, leveraging their porous architecture to regulate lithium nucleation, enhance mechanical stability, and maintain electrochemical equilibrium. Despite their potential, current implementations confront four key constraints: excessively large pore sizes, uneven surface current distribution (leading to non-uniform lithium deposition, dendrite growth, and dead lithium formation), poor lithiophilicity, and weak oxidation resistance. These factors hinder the long-term suppression of lithium dendrites and degrade the oxidation resistance of copper nanostructures. This review systematically examines recent advancements in 3D copper foam engineering through three principal modification approaches: metallic/alloy coatings, surface functionalization, and structural optimization. The advantages, limitations, and critical issues of these approaches are analyzed. Furthermore, the importance of 3D copper foam current collectors in advancing lithium metal batteries is elucidated, highlighting current achievements, areas for improvement, and potential applications. Finally, recommendations and future prospects for further optimization of 3D copper foam current collectors are proposed to achieve commercially viable lithium metal batteries.

Indexed as

Copper foamcurrent collectorlithium dendriteslithium-ion batterieslithium metal

Identifiers

PMID40980456
PMCPMC12444963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.