Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980431›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Design of an integrated multi-modal machine learning framework for real-time student engagement evaluation and learning outcome optimizations.

Deepali Kayande, Swetta Kukreja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepali KayandeAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Mumbai, India.
Swetta KukrejaAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proposed framework achieved the highest accuracy of 94.2% in engagement prediction, 92.3% in dropout risk forecasting, and 91.5% in cognitive load estimation, surpassing contemporary baselines by 4% to 12% on all evaluation metrics. Adaptive learning pathways produced by the RL-ALP component enhance distance learning outcomes by 14.3% and decrease dropout rates by approximately 20.3%. Furthermore, real-time implementation is enabled due to the framework's computational efficiency, achieving inference time at 21.3 ms, which is about 50% faster than prior works. The findings thus affirm this system's capability of combining the behavioral, physiological, and interactional data modalities for accurate real-time monitoring of engagement and adaptive learning optimizations.1.A multi-modal framework integrating behavioral, physiological, and interaction-based features for engagement assessment.2.Five interconnected models leverage real-world datasets to improve cognitive load estimation and dropout prediction.3.Data-driven insights assist educators in optimizing learning strategies for better student retention and performance.

Indexed as

Adaptive learningCognitive load estimationGraph neural networksMachine learningStudent engagement

Identifiers

PMID40980431
PMCPMC12446545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.