Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980393›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

A retrospective analysis of the efficacy of baseball suture method in single-port laparoscopic myomectomy.

Kang Wu, Dandan Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kang WuKang Wu Department of Gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, China.
Dandan ShenDandan Shen Department of Gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the hemostatic effect of baseball suture after myomectomy under single-port laparoscopy. Methodology: Retrospective review of 91 patients admitted to Department of Gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital from July 2021 to August 2023 who had myomas removed via single-port laparoscopy. We counted the suture method (traditional suture method vs baseball suture method) of each case divided into two groups (41 cases in control group; 50 cases in experimental group), and assessed the amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hemoglobin decrease, and pelvic effusion. Propensity score matching (PSM) between groups was performed by the maximum diameter of the myoma, patient's age, number of myomas, type of myoma, and location of myoma. Results: After PSM, a total of 38 pairs were matched. The mean amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hemoglobin decrease, and pelvic fluid accumulation in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group (115.79ml vs 94.34ml; 16.55g/l vs 12.79g/l; 146.74ml vs 119.13ml P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (83.84min vs 87.79min P>0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggested that using baseball suture method can significantly reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hemoglobin decrease, and pelvic fluid accumulation in patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic myomectomy compared with traditional suture method. In addition, although using baseball suture method is more cumbersome, it does not significantly increase operation time.

Indexed as

Baseball SutureBleedingGynecological SurgeryHemostasisMyomectomySingle-port Laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40980393
PMCPMC12444134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.