ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Clinical effects of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site extracorporeal surgery in treatment of giant ovarian cysts and huge cystic pelvic masses.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and aesthetic outcomes of transumbilical single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site extracorporeal surgery (TU-LESS-E) in the treatment of giant ovarian cysts and huge cystic pelvic masses. Methodology: This was a retrospective study. Sixty patients diagnosed with giant ovarian cysts and huge cystic pelvic masses undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in Maternity & Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao from May 2022 to October 2024 were selected, and randomly divided into observation group and control group (n=30 each group). The control group was given conventional multiport laparoscopy, while the observation group was treated with TU-LESS-E cystectomy. Perioperative outcomes such as surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of cystic fluid overflow, pain intensity six hours and 24 hours, one months and three months after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss or surgical duration between the two groups ( Conclusion: TU-LESS-E presents good results in the treatment of giant ovarian cysts and huge cystic pelvic masses. It can reduce surgical traumas and pain, the occurrence of cystic fluid overflow, as well as impact on ovarian reserve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.