ArticlePhysical therapy research2025
Reliability and Validity of Observational Gait Analysis by Physical Therapists: Possibility of Verifying Accuracy and Improving Technology in Visual Measurement of Joint Angles.
Article in Physical therapy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Task Assessment of Context-Specific Gait Changes to Virtual Reality-Based Visual Perturbations.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Reliability of the Dynamic Foot Index for Observational Assessment of Foot Motion During Gait.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe reliability of observational gait analyses is generally considered poor or moderate. This is considered due to the drawbacks in the experimental designs and measurement methods used in related studies. This study examined the reliability and validity of physical therapists' (PTs) visual joint angle estimation in gait analysis with a rigorous design.
methodsTwenty PTs were divided into 2 groups of 10 each based on their experience: <10 years and >10 years. They observed videos and still images of patients with gait disorders and visually estimated the joint angles at specific points during the gait cycle. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and validity was assessed by a correlation analysis, which compared their estimates with reference values obtained from the digital video analysis.
resultsIntra-rater reliability for visual estimation using video tended to exceed 0.6 for most indicators, whereas inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.04 to 0.59. For validity, correlation coefficients indicated an accuracy of 0.06-0.62 for video and 0.08-0.68 for still images.
conclusionsAlthough intra-rater reliability tended to be higher than inter-rater reliability, neither reached levels considered sufficiently reliable, and validity showed only limited agreement with reference values. These results highlight the limitations of visual estimation in joint angle assessment. Future efforts should focus not only on improving observational consistency but also on improving agreement with reference values through corrective training using still images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.