Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980347›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy research2025

Development of a Competency Scale for Rehabilitation Professionals Supporting Kayoi-no-ba in Japan.

Mutsumi Nakamura, Yoshifumi Urabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mutsumi NakamuraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Tohto University Faculty of Human Care at Makuhari, Japan.
Yoshifumi UrabeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ohashi Hospital, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecently, rehabilitation professionals in Japan have become increasingly involved in Kayoi-no-ba for long-term care prevention. However, there are significant differences in the quality and content of professional rehabilitation support. This study aimed to develop a competency scale for rehabilitation professionals who support Kayoi-no-ba.

methodsA survey was mailed to rehabilitation supervisors at 440 facilities selected from a nationwide Internet search of facilities that implement the "community-based rehabilitation activity support project," and rehabilitation professionals involved in supporting Kayoi-no-ba were asked to respond to the survey. The questionnaire was self-administered, and responses were sought via a 6-point scale for the 50 proposed competency items. For statistical analysis, exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale. Covariance structure analysis was used to assess model fit and to evaluate the reliability and internal consistency of the scale.

resultsAmong the 260 facilities that responded (59.1%), 607 participants provided valid responses. The final competency scale had a 3-factor structure (knowledge and attitude, ability to coordinate groups, and clinical practice skills) comprising 20 items. Model fit and internal consistency were good.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that rehabilitation professionals who support Kayoi-no-ba should have the attitude and knowledge of supporters, the ability to coordinate groups, and the clinical practice skills of rehabilitation therapists. This competency scale could be used as a guideline to improve the quality of support.

Indexed as

A competency scaleKayoi-no-baLong-term care preventionOlder residentsRehabilitation professionals’ support

Identifiers

PMID40980347
PMCPMC12445359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.