ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2025
Development and Application of Endoscopic Antireflux Mucosectomy in Treating Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is primarily managed with acid suppressors, while laparoscopic fundoplication is considered the gold-standard surgical treatment for patients who have a suboptimal response to medical therapy, despite its limited acceptance. However, there have been alternative endoscopic treatment techniques available, including radiofrequency therapy, transoral fundoplication, and mucosal resection or mucosal ablation for this subgroup of patients, among which antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) stands out as a relatively novel and minimally invasive option. The objective of this article is to provide gastroenterologists with a more comprehensive understanding of the technical features, current application status, clinical outcomes, and future perspectives regarding ARMS in the management of GERD. It is expected that ARMS will have a place in the standard endoscopic treatment of GERD. In the meantime, long-term multicenter, large-sample studies are required to provide a more convincing evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.