ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Arthroscopic Versus Open Iliopsoas Release After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Analysis of effectiveness of arthroscopic iliopsoas tendon tenotomy at labral level for iliopsoas cyst complicated with internal snapping hip].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Iliopsoas-Related Groin Pain: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes and complication rates between open and arthroscopic iliopsoas (IP) tenotomy between 1998 and 2023 at our institution. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening (IPFL) or open tenotomy for IP tendinitis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 1988 and 2023 were identified. Patients were excluded if they underwent revision IP tendon release, had additional concomitant procedures, or had less than a 24-month postoperative follow-up. Patient records were reviewed, and patient-reported outcomes were collected via electronic survey. Results: Fifty-two patients (36 arthroscopic, 16 open) were followed for an average of 68.7 (24.0-203.7) months. Overall surgery satisfaction was 7.9 (scale 0-10) following arthroscopic IPFL and 6.0 following open tenotomy ( Conclusions: Patients have improved pain at rest following arthroscopic IPFL when compared to open tenotomy for IP tendinitis following THA. Overall complication and reoperation rates were low for both techniques. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.