Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980237›Full record

ReviewArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

Current Techniques for Processing Osteochondral Allografts Are Variable: A Systematic Review.

Michael J Meade, Kisan Patel, Nicholas A Sgaglione

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael J MeadeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, New York, U.S.A.
Kisan PatelZucker Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, U.S.A.
Nicholas A SgaglioneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, New York, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the current optimal processing and storage protocols for fresh cold-stored osteochondral allografts (OCAs) used for resurfacing osteochondral defects in the knee. Methods: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were queried for peer-reviewed articles on OCA storage and processing techniques. Articles were excluded if performed on nonhuman subjects or were narrative or systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or other forms of secondary sources. In vivo data included study type, population size, follow-up time, type, site and location of injury, description of surgery, description of postoperative rehabilitation, and outcome criteria used. Ex vivo data collection included tissue source and type, storage procedure including temperature, media changes, gas environment, storage solution including type of solution and additive used, cell viability methodology, and outcomes methodology. Results: In total, 386 studies were screened between the 3 databases, with 27 studies satisfying all criteria. Eight human studies were included, with mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score of 48.38 ± 5.73. In total, 397 total patients were included with a mean of 49.6 patients per study. Five of the 8 studies had follow-up greater than 24 months. Three articles were retrospective studies, 4 were case series, 1 was a prospective cohort. Four articles were Level III evidence, 4 articles were Level IV evidence. In addition, 19 ex vivo human studies were included. A total of 78.95% of studies included grafts stored at 4°C or 1 to 10°C, 31.58% investigated 37°C, and 21.05% investigated room temperature. In total, 19 different storage media were investigated, with 68.42% including various additives. Conclusions: OCA storage at 4°C remains the most common temperature with the most evidence-based research. However, investigation of OCAs at 37°C and room temperature, particularly those stored with proprietary protocol such as the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System, have shown promising results at improved maintenance of viable chondrocyte density. Variability in storage media remains without clear consensus. Clinical Relevance: A variety of methodologies are used for OCAs, and the best strategies are not well understood. There is a need to compile the available evidence from in vivo and ex vivo studies of OCAs to resolve conflicts regarding various available methodologies and provide better understanding of current techniques.

Identifiers

PMID40980237
PMCPMC12447100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.