ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Stakeholder feedback regarding a statewide protocol for pharmacists to prescribe tobacco cessation medications.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Smoking contributes to negative clinical and economic outcomes in the United States, yet most adults who smoke and report wanting to quit do not access counseling or use medications to assist cessation. In rural states, such as Kansas, access to evidence-based tobacco treatment is more challenging, and most quit attempts go unassisted. Although legislation introducing a statewide policy for pharmacists to prescribe all FDA-approved tobacco cessation medications has been implemented in other states, it is unknown if such legislation would be supported in Kansas. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize stakeholder perceptions of model language for a statewide policy permitting pharmacists to prescribe medications for tobacco cessation in Kansas. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to tobacco control stakeholders, who were asked to review the Indiana Statewide Protocol for Dispensing Tobacco Cessation Products by Pharmacists and provide feedback on each section, via a web-based survey. Associations, insurance carriers, governmental entities, and community pharmacies were approached for recruitment. Collected data were analyzed to identify sections receiving support and to summarize feedback for recommendations to modify the protocol language. Results: Fifteen surveys (34 %) were completed, representing various stakeholder organizations and community pharmacies in Kansas. Sections receiving the most feedback include the introduction, purpose, pharmacist qualifications, products covered, health screening, and referral of high-risk patients. Conclusion: Findings suggest that most tobacco control stakeholders in Kansas will be supportive of a statewide protocol for pharmacists to independently prescribe tobacco cessation products. Sections will be modified, based on respondents' feedback, to create a revised protocol that will be mutually acceptable to all stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.