ArticleFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2023
An industry perspective on the use of machine learning in drug and vaccine safety.
Article in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising Pharmacovigilance Efficiency with MLIT (Machine Learning for Intelligent Triage): A Tool for Statistical Safety Alerts.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence: Applications in Pharmacovigilance Signal Management.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Orchestrating generative AI in pharmacovigilance: predicting and preempting the unpredictable.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Review
- Pharmacovigilance in Vaccines: Importance, Main Aspects, Perspectives, and Challenges-A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Pilot, Predictive Surveillance Model in Pharmacovigilance Using Machine Learning Approaches.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- A discovery and verification approach to pharmacovigilance using electronic healthcare data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
- Editorial: Computational methods and systems to support decision making in pharmacovigilance.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years there has been growing interest in the use of machine learning across the pharmacovigilance lifecycle to enhance safety monitoring of drugs and vaccines. Here we describe the scope of industry-based research into the use of machine learning for safety purposes. We conducted an examination of the findings from a previously published systematic review; 393 papers sourced from a literature search from 2000-2021 were analyzed and attributed to either industry, academia, or regulatory authorities. Overall, 33 papers verified to be industry contributions were then assigned to one of six categories representing the most frequent PV functions (data ingestion, disease-specific studies, literature review, real world data, signal detection, and social media). RWD and social media comprised 63% (21/33) of the papers, signal detection and data ingestion comprised 18% (6/33) of the papers, while disease-specific studies and literature reviews represented 12% (4/33) and 6% (2/33) of the papers, respectively. Herein we describe the trends and opportunities observed in industry application of machine learning in pharmacovigilance, along with discussing the potential barriers. We conclude that although progress to date has been uneven, industry is very interested in applying machine learning to the pharmacovigilance lifecycle, which it is hoped may ultimately enhance patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.