ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Influence of relative strength on the optimal load of the hang power clean and hang high pull in collegiate athletes.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although training load is a critical determinant of adequate training stimuli for athletes, the optimal load for power training varies across individuals, and the underlying factors contributing to this variability remain unclear. Objective: This study investigated the influence of relative strength on optimal load during the execution of the hang power clean (HPC) and hang high pull (HHP) among college athletes. Methods: A total of 30 male college athletes (mean ± standard deviation age, 21.8 ± 2.3 years) performed hang power cleans (HPCs) and hang high pulls (HHPs) on a three-dimensional force plate at loads corresponding to 45%, 65%, 80%, and 95% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), presented in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The relationship between optimal load and relative strength was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: The optimal load for achieving maximum output power in the hang high pull (HPP) and hang power clean (HPC) exhibited a highly individualized characteristic.A significant positive correlation was found between athlete strength and optimal load for both the HPC ( Conclusions: A positive correlation between optimal load and the relative strength of the athlete for the HPC and the HHP indicated that as the athlete's strength increased, the load intensity should be appropriately increased to maintain efficient training stimulation to elicit maximum power for each athlete. However, this study did not examine female collegiate athletes and other athletic populations. coaches should be discreetly when applying this conclusion to these athletic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.