ArticleExperimental mechanics2025
Evaluation of Recyclable Multilayer Packaging Designs Utilising Controlled Interlayer Adhesion.
Article in Experimental mechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adhesives and Sealants in Packaging: Advanced Materials, Performance, and Emerging Technologies (Part II).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Adhesives and Sealants in Packaging: Functional Roles and System-Level Classification (Part I).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Toward Greener Multilayer Packaging Material Solutions Based on Microbial Protein and Polyhydroxyalkanoate.ACS applied engineering materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The packaging industry is utilising increased levels of bio-based or recycled plastics and virgin plastic-based packaging is irreplaceable in more demanding applications such as food and pharmaceutical storage where different types of functional plastics are combined in a laminate form to produce multilayered packaging (MLP). Even though MLP are very effective in packaging applications, the typical multilayer format is a barrier to effective recycling, limiting the value and market for the use of recovered materials. Objective: This article investigates two new multilayer packaging design concepts which enable separation of the constituent layers in MLP. In these designs, the typical thermoset based adhesive layer in MLP is replaced by (i) localised adhesion by patterning surface treatments on the layers (no dedicated tie-layer) and (ii) by a water-soluble adhesive layer. Methods: T-peel testing is performed to evaluate the level of adhesion. The feasibility of these designs to enable layer separation was also investigated through representative tests that the simulated typical processes of shredding and washing in recycling streams. Results: The effectiveness of masks to localise surface treatment and thus create regions of higher and lower adhesion was captured in the peel test results for design A. The comparatively low levels of adhesion in design A enabled an easy separation of layers. An excellent adhesive was observed in peel test for design B with water soluble tie layer and the layers were separated by dissolving the tie layer in water. Conclusions: These concepts targeting the interface between MLP layers can be scaled with MLP complexity. Potentially, a combination of the two strategies could yield an optimal solution, where the total surface area of adhered MLP is reduced due to localised adhesion and a distinct water-soluble adhesive layer provides the necessary adhesive strength comparable to current MLP applications. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11340-025-01200-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.