ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2025
A patient similarity-embedded Bayesian approach to prognostic biomarker inference with application to thoracic cancer immunity.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Counterfactual Machine Learning Individualizes Radiation Modality Selection to Mitigate Immunosuppression.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel statistical methodology integrating machine learning (ML) and Bayesian modelling to facilitate personalized prognostic predictions with application to oncology. Utilizing power priors, we construct 'patient-similarity embeddings' that identify localized patterns of prognosis. The methodology is applied to study the prognostic value of markers of anticancer immunity within the tumour microenvironment of nonsmall cell lung cancer while adjusting for established clinical characteristics. The method outperforms traditional regression and ML models, while accurately identifying subgroup patterns, thereby enhancing statistical inference and hypothesis testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.