Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979983›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

May Measurement Month 2022: an analysis of blood pressure screening results from Brazil.

Bruna Eibel, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso, Thomas Beaney, Gabriele Kerr, Neil R Poulter, Lucélia Batista Neves Cunha Guimarães, Elizabeth E S Cestario, Abraham B Epelman, Luis Aparecido Bortolotto, Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bruna EibelInstitute of Cardiology, University Foundation of Cardiology, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Weimar Kunz Sebba BarrosoFederal University of Goias - Hypertension Unit, Medicine School, Goiania, Brazil.
Thomas BeaneyImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, Stadium House, 68 Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9709-7264
Gabriele KerrImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, Stadium House, 68 Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, UK.
Neil R PoulterImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, Stadium House, 68 Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, UK.
Lucélia Batista Neves Cunha GuimarãesFaculdades Integradas do Extremo Sul Da Bahia - Medicine School, Rod, Br 367, Km 14, Eunápolis/Porto Seguro, Eunápolis, Brazil.
Elizabeth E S CestarioCardiology League Coordinator, University Center of Votuporanga, Votuporanga, Brazil.
Abraham B EpelmanMedical Affairs Department, Servier Brazil Laboratories, Estrada dos Bandeirantes 4211, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22775-113, Brazil.
Luis Aparecido BortolottoBrazilian Society of Hypertension, Instituto do Coração (InCor), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Costa Duarte BarbosaDepartment of Hypertension and Cariometabolism, São Francisco Hospital, Santa Casa de Miseticórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-936X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The May Measurement Month (MMM) campaign was carried out in Brazil in 2022 with the aim of raising awareness of raised blood pressure (BP). Here, we report on the findings of the campaign. Adults aged ≥18 years were recruited opportunistically, including a population with representation from all Brazilian states and reflects some of the characteristics of hypertension in Brazil. Three seated BP readings were taken for each participant, along with completion of a questionnaire on demographics, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or on antihypertensive medication use. Controlled BP was defined as being on antihypertensive medication with a BP <140/90 mmHg. Multiple imputation was used to estimate any missing BP readings. In total, 11 544 were screened, with a mean age of 53.4 years and 55.3% of whom were female. Of all participants, 6858 (59.4%) had hypertension, of whom 5548 (80.9%) were aware, and 5072 (74.0%) were on antihypertensive medication. Of those on antihypertensive medication, 2732 (53.9%) had controlled BP, and of all participants with hypertension, 39.8% had controlled BP. In total, 4126 (35.7%) were found to have either untreated or inadequately treated hypertension. The MMM campaign in Brazil identified high rates of hypertension among participants and about 60% of hypertensives were either untreated or inadequately treated, which are likely to be contributors to the major causes of death in the country.

Indexed as

Blood PressureControlHypertensionScreeningTreatment

Identifiers

PMID40979983
PMCPMC12449184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.