ReviewStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures.
Review in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Intra-articular distal tibia fractures can lead to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Joint distraction has shown promise in elective cases of osteoarthritis (OA) by temporarily offloading joint forces and potentially facilitating cartilage regeneration. However, its application in acute fractures remains unexplored. This pilot study aims to investigate the benefits of joint distraction in acute fractures. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study comprising consecutive patients with intra-articular distal tibia and pilon fractures, treated with a circular ring fixator (CRF) and ankle distraction as part of their fracture management, was undertaken at a single centre.Prospective data collection included radiological assessments, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), complications, necessity for additional procedures, and the Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KL) for OA. Results: There were 137 patients included in the study, among them 30 in the distraction group and 107 in the non-distraction group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, distribution of open or closed fractures, diabetic status, and smoking status between the groups. Mean follow-up was 3.73 years.There was no significant difference between the distraction and non-distraction groups in overall complications or need for further procedures. The mean radiological follow-up was 1.90 years, there was no significant difference in progression of KL between the groups (1.81 vs 2.0, Conclusion: Ankle joint distraction in the management of acute ankle fractures did not influence outcomes for patients in short and medium term follow-up. Future work should investigate for long-term effects of this auxiliary technique when using circular external fixators, in particular on the development of PTOA. How to cite this article: Faraj A, Hammett F, Lineham B,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.