ReviewStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Information Transparency for Elective Stature Lengthening Surgery: A Secret Shopper Study.
Review in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elective stature lengthening (ESL) has gained popularity among individuals seeking to increase their height. Despite its growing appeal, online information about ESL often lacks consistency and transparency. This study evaluates the quality and comprehensiveness of online resources available to prospective patients, focusing on clarity in communication, cost, recovery expectations, and complications. Methods: Using a secret shopper methodology, we contacted 27 eligible orthopaedic practices globally that offered ESL, posing as a healthy 35-year-old male seeking ESL. Practices were contacted via email and follow-up phone calls using a standardised script. Responses were analysed to evaluate the availability, depth, and variability of information on key topics, including surgery duration, recovery time, cost, insurance coverage, and complications. Results: Contact was successfully established with 17 (63%) of practices. However, only 3/27 (11%) of the contacted practices answered all scripted questions. Cost estimates varied substantially, ranging from $15,000 to $150,118 (mean = $77,133, SD = $35,603.58). Recovery time was similarly variable, ranging from 2 to 365 days (mean = 202 days, SD = 137.27). Crucial details, such as patient eligibility and potential complications, were frequently omitted. Conclusion: The study highlights a critical need for improved transparency and standardisation in online resources for ESL. Addressing these gaps could enhance patient trust, satisfaction, and informed decision-making, underscoring the importance of establishing guidelines for consistent communication in this emerging field. How to cite this article: Shenoy DA, Santamaria G, Gomez-Alvarado F,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.