ReviewStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Vascularised Fibula Transfer for Post-traumatic Critical Tibial Bone Defects: A Systematic Review.
Review in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful Management of Midshaft Ulna Non-union Using Vascularized Fibula Grafting Following Failed Internal Fixation: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Combination of pedicled fibular graft and latissimus dorsi free flap in complex tibial bone defect reconstruction after high-energy trauma: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Managing post-traumatic critical bone defects in the tibia remains challenging. Vascularised free fibula grafts (VFFG) are an attractive option due to their versatility and ability to integrate with host bone. However, they are challenging, and their role compared to alternative techniques, such as bone transport and Masquelet, remains unclear. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of free fibula flaps in reconstructing critical tibia defects following trauma. Materials and methods: Five databases were searched for English-language studies from inception until August 2024. Inclusion criteria involved adult patients undergoing VFFG to the tibia for trauma-induced bone defects. Case reports and studies involving non-traumatic and/or critical bone injury and/or those not undergoing fibula transfer were excluded. Bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Fifteen studies involving 83 patients with a mean age of 35.07 ± 12.16 (range: 18-65) were included. Ipsilateral fibula transfer was preferred ( Conclusion: Vascularised free fibula grafts are effective for reconstructing large segmental tibia defects post-trauma, achieving high union and flap survival rates. However, complication rates are high, and study heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions on the technique's superiority. Further prospective comparative studies are required to characterise the role of VFFG. How to cite this article: How to cite this article: Glynou SP, Georgiannakis A, Ardolino D,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.