Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979924›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health information science and practice2025

Evaluating Patient Literacy in the Health Information Space: What Does Release of Information Tell Us?

Darin Challacombe, Elizabeth N McElhiney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health information science and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Darin ChallacombeTalent Development Verisma Systems.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5778-2021
Elizabeth N McElhineyCompliance Verisma Systems.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Some research on social determinants of health (SDOH) has suggested that patient health literacy (HL) or comprehension can influence health outcomes, while other recent studies have not observed strong connections between those variables. Previous research has utilized various screening tools to assess patient HL, with varying success. Methods: In this three-phase study, the authors assessed the "readability" of various common patient health information documents and forms used by prominent US-based healthcare organizations and requestors, including authorizations and privacy notices, according to the Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch Reading Ease scales. Results: The results showed that the documents examined had readability scores higher than the average American's literacy level. Conclusions: Confirming anecdotal data, this research supports the conclusion that many forms signed by American patients are above their average reading level and therefore they may not have a full understanding of what they are signing, even when requesting that records to be sent to others.

Indexed as

ComprehensionHealth LiteracyHumansUnited Stateshealth literacypatientrelease of informationsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40979924
PMCPMC12366712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.