ArticleAdvances in health information science and practice2025
Health Professionals' Satisfaction with the Use of Electronic Health Records System for Healthcare Delivery in Ghana.
Article in Advances in health information science and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Health professionals' perceptions of electronic health records system: a mixed method study in Ghana.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Satisfaction with a given Electronic Health Record (EHR) system has become an important topic in healthcare. As healthcare providers increasingly rely on EHRs to manage patient care, their satisfaction with the system significantly impacts their quality of care. This study analyzed the satisfaction of health professionals who use the EHR called Lightwave Health Information Management System (LHIMS; Lightwave eHealthcare Solutions, Ghana) for healthcare delivery. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used for this study. The study employed the stratified probability sampling method. Descriptive statistics were computed to determine the weighted mean score for all the indicators under efficiency. Also, bivariate (chi-square) and multivariate (ordinal logistic regression) analyses were conducted to test the study's hypotheses. Results: Factors such as educational qualification, work experience, training status, duration of the training, and computer efficacy significantly affected health professionals' satisfaction with LHIMS. Sex and age of health professionals did not affect satisfaction levels with LHIMS. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, health professional participants were satisfied with aspects of LHIMS such as flexibility and consistency, which increases the speed of task execution and enables them to easily retrieve accurate information. Results suggested that training, while necessary, must be tailored to individual user needs. Digital literacy also played a pivotal role in ensuring effective EHR use, with advanced users reporting greater satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.